Game show idea

I had an interesting idea for a gameshow today. Basically, there's two or so contestants, each with a whiteboard, a marker, and nothing else. Then, the host then gives them a programming problem, and they have X minutes to design the needed data structures. Whoever has the simplest, most efficient, data structures wins the round.

Hey, I'd want to watch it...

mod-boot

Recently I had an interesting idea to improve boot speed on FOSS operating systems. I'll give some basics here, and then sometime maybe I'll add some more details on my website.

It started some time ago when I was reading all the Fedora stuff that was being planned and/or thought about, and something struck me as very interesting: Early GDM. Basically, the idea was that, instead of starting all the services needed for a runlevel during boot, you only run what's absolutely needed for GDM, and then once GDM and X.org is up finish with the other stuff.

I thought that was a brilliant idea, since it could lead to really short boot times. So I thought about it, and my idea is to have init start a C program with different command line options depending on the runlevel init wants, and then the C program would be in charge of running various daemons and configuration scripts asynchronously with a dependency system so that the user can configure with a configuration file what the goal daemon is. What I'm thinking of then is a directory for each runlevel, and all the scripts in each runlevel are analyzed for dependencies and a viable parallel execution order is run using forks and pipes. I'm not sure how backward compatibility will work (since every vendor has their own system... *groan*...), but I think something could be gimmicked with links since I'm not replacing init itself.

I've already designed a simple algorithm to determine the execution order, but I'm still attempting to optimize it so that it will work in parallel for performance reasons (especially now that all the major vendors have 4-core processors).

Tell me what you think.

I'm so whimsical...

I'm so whimsical sometimes. I just decided to throw my old desktop a new curveball. Yup, I'm going to reformat it and install Windoze 3.11.

This isn't completely batty; I've gotten a lot of positive feedback on the idea of a Windoze 3.11 clone for Linux, and I wanted to refresh my memory of good ol' 'doze. Now I realize I could have just installed bochs or something, but I realized that my ethernet cable was plugged into my laptop rather then my desktop, and rather then reach three feet behind me to grab it, I decided to just toss away everything on my hard drive.

Logical, aren't I?

Universal Combat Gold

Recently I finally got around to getting back into Gametap, and I got addicted to two games: Comanche 4 and Universal Combat Gold. The latter is more blog-worthy, so I'll talk about it.

Universal Combat Gold is a somewhat recent addition to the Battlecruiser Millennium series, which really is a fascinating concept. Basically, you can work in space, planet atmosphere, and ground, for trading, combat, etc, and even move between them. The problem is that it's poorly executed. The graphics are primitive at best, the controls and UI were designed by monkeys working in combination with the geniuses behind Falcon 4.0, and it's unbelievably buggy (do not, I repeat, do not minimize the game. You end up having to kill it with the task manager). And if you're a marine, you die a lot. Irritatingly much, in fact.
So I have a simple question: Why, oh why am I addicted to it?

Graphics: 3/5 - Quite primitive, but there are enough different environments to allow me to forgive that.
Gameplay: 2/5 - Unbelievably stupid. Fascinating in theory, though.
Stability: 2/5 - Playable, but just barely.
Tilt: 4/5 - Don't ask. I have no clue either.
Bottom line: 2.75 - Buggy, bad graphics, complex gameplay, but strangely fun.
Extra comments: According to the Gametap description, you're supposed to spend hundreds of hours mastering this game. Honestly, I don't have that kind of time. Also, for that reason, this is primarily a review of the ground and atmosphere modes. Space seems less buggy, but also less playable.

Let the classes begin!

It's that time of year again. Yup, you guessed it: classes begin.

My math stuff has arrived for Precalc II, and as I type this I'm supposed to be working on it.
Drivers ed also started a few days ago, where I spend 3 hours per night watching movies that tell me things I already know and listening to things I already read. Oh well, at least soon I'll get my permit.

Soon Spanish III will begin (and of course I've forgotten everything I learned in Spanish I and II...) along with debate. Oh, right, and my C/C++ programing class at the University, which will be succeeded right afterwards by a scheme course. *Groan*

On the bright side, VetClix has been making some real progress. I started using Subversion, so my work can make it to bleeding-edge people without my having to make releases.

Pegasus Prime

I just noticed that I forgot to update on my math course: I passed, and did pretty well.

Finally, the game I've been wanting for ages is in the mail. Those of you who don't know me should know that I am and always will be a Journeyman Project fanatic. Pegasus Prime was the "Director's Cut" of the first game in the series. Unfortunately, it was also mac-only. So, I bought it to look at the box. I'm so logical sometimes. Actually I'm planning to emulate it, but first I'll have to buy a copy of Mac OS 9 on Ebay.

Is it worth the money and effort to get a decade-old game working on a totally different platform then that for which it was made? I have little doubt that the answer is "yes" in this case.

Reviews:

• Four Fat Chicks - 5/5
• MacGamer - 80%
• Just Adventure - A (Contains mild language and a popup)